From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: irq-armada-370-xp: fix regression by clearing IRQ_NOAUTOEN
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:41:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151021144110.GH3953@io.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445435295-19956-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Hey Thomas-i, Thomases, :)
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:48:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Commit d17cab4451df1 ("irqchip: Kill off set_irq_flags usage") changed
> the code of armada_370_xp_mpic_irq_map() from using set_irq_flags() to
> irq_set_probe().
>
> While the commit log seems to imply that there are no functional
> changes, there are indeed functional changes introduced by this
> commit: the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag is no longer cleared. This functional
> change causes a regression on Armada XP, which no longer works
> properly after suspend/resume because per-CPU interrupts remain
> disabled.
>
> Due to how the hardware registers work, the irq-armada-370-xp cannot
> simply save/restore a bunch of registers at suspend/resume to make
> sure that the interrupts remain in the same state after
> resuming. Therefore, it relies on the kernel to say whether the
> interrupt is disabled or not, using the irqd_irq_disabled()
> function. This was all working fine while the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag was
> cleared.
>
> With the change introduced by Rob Herring in d17cab4451df1, the
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag is now set for all interrupts. irqd_irq_disabled()
> returns false for per-CPU interrupts, and therefore our per-CPU
> interrupts are no longer re-enabled after resume.
>
> This commit works around this problem by clearing again the
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN flags, so that we are back to the situation we had before
> commit d17cab4451df1. This work around is proposed as a minimal fix
> for the problem, while a better long-term solution is being worked on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Here is the one-line minimal change that tglx said would be more
> acceptable to have in 4.3.
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied to irqchip/urgent with minor tweaking of the subject line. I
trust at this point it's ok to pull in -rc2.
thx,
Jason.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-21 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 13:23 [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] kernel: irq: implement is_enabled_percpu_irq() Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: prepare additions to armada_xp_mpic_secondary_init() Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:00 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: re-enable per-CPU interrupts at resume time Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:46 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-25 21:22 ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-26 0:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-26 4:35 ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-26 5:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-26 7:06 ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-26 8:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: re-order register definitions Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:55 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: document the overall driver logic Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:59 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 14:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:07 ` Jason Cooper
2015-10-20 14:04 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Jason Cooper
2015-10-20 14:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-20 14:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 19:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-22 8:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 19:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-21 13:48 ` [PATCH] irqchip: irq-armada-370-xp: fix regression by clearing IRQ_NOAUTOEN Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-21 14:41 ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2015-10-21 13:49 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-11 8:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-13 20:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-04 11:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-05 17:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-06 9:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-08 8:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-08 10:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-24 16:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151021144110.GH3953@io.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).