From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: uniphier: add outer cache support and rework SMP operations
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:22:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027002237.GA20409@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASA-fmS943We9ncXUNQTa17s85OPmnWEdcY0yxTpW9hTA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:16:50PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
>
> 2015-10-10 15:59 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> >
> > 2015-10-06 15:22 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> >> On Tuesday 06 October 2015 16:20:23 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> On Friday 18 September 2015 13:37:31 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>> > Hi Olof,
> >>> >
> >>> > Now Linux 4.3-rc1 is out, so I am back to this.
> >>> >
> >>> > 1/3: add outer cache support
> >>> > 2/3: rework SMP operations
> >>> > 3/3: add device tree nodes
> >>> >
> >>> > Because 2/3 highly depends on 1/3, I hope whole of this series
> >>> > is applied through ARM-SOC tree.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the long delay here. Is this the latest version of these
> >>> patches?
> >>>
> >>> Did Russell King review the first patch?
> >>> Is he ok with merging this through arm-soc?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I found an answer to the first question, as I see you posted
> >> v5 of the patchset in the meantime.
> >
> >
> > Yes, v5 is my latest version.
> >
> >
> > For the second question, Russell gave me some comments on the 1/3
> > and I answered.
> >
> > He mentioned nothing about merging the whole series thru arm-soc.
> > (At least, he was not opposed to it, I guess)
> >
>
> Is it difficult to apply this series for the next merge window?
> V5 is the latest.
> No comment, but not applied.
>
> Is there anything I can do but wait?
Looks like this one has fallen between the cracks, so sorry about that.
I checked in with Russell, and we'll pick this up for now even if it might
need some minor fixups down the road -- it seems good enough to go in.
Applied v5 of all 3 patches, first two to next/soc, last to next/dt.
Thanks, and apologies for the delay,
-Olof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-18 4:37 [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: uniphier: add outer cache support and rework SMP operations Masahiro Yamada
2015-09-18 4:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: uniphier: add outer cache support Masahiro Yamada
2015-09-21 14:06 ` Rob Herring
2015-09-21 19:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-22 5:27 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-09-26 15:32 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-09-18 4:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: uniphier: rework SMP operations to use trampoline code Masahiro Yamada
2015-09-18 4:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: uniphier: add outer cache controller nodes Masahiro Yamada
2015-10-06 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: uniphier: add outer cache support and rework SMP operations Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-06 14:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-10 6:59 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-10-26 4:16 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-10-27 0:22 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027002237.GA20409@localhost \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).