From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:22:37 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: uniphier: add outer cache support and rework
 SMP operations
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASA-fmS943We9ncXUNQTa17s85OPmnWEdcY0yxTpW9hTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1442551054-2116-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
 <6239461.UGe6XP3dfB@wuerfel> <5275814.I392BfIEUH@wuerfel>
 <CAK7LNATgK0OQbu_9J7DjUfDA_dKSCkCS4Kqw6vXD+=5oxkw4ig@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK7LNASA-fmS943We9ncXUNQTa17s85OPmnWEdcY0yxTpW9hTA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20151027002237.GA20409@localhost>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:16:50PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> 
> 2015-10-10 15:59 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> >
> > 2015-10-06 15:22 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> >> On Tuesday 06 October 2015 16:20:23 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> On Friday 18 September 2015 13:37:31 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>> > Hi Olof,
> >>> >
> >>> > Now Linux 4.3-rc1 is out, so I am back to this.
> >>> >
> >>> > 1/3: add outer cache support
> >>> > 2/3: rework SMP operations
> >>> > 3/3: add device tree nodes
> >>> >
> >>> > Because 2/3 highly depends on 1/3, I hope whole of this series
> >>> > is applied through ARM-SOC tree.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the long delay here. Is this the latest version of these
> >>> patches?
> >>>
> >>> Did Russell King review the first patch?
> >>> Is he ok with merging this through arm-soc?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I found an answer to the first question, as I see you posted
> >> v5 of the patchset in the meantime.
> >
> >
> > Yes, v5 is my latest version.
> >
> >
> > For the second question, Russell gave me some comments on the 1/3
> > and I answered.
> >
> > He mentioned nothing about merging the whole series thru arm-soc.
> > (At least, he was not opposed to it, I guess)
> >
> 
> Is it difficult to apply this series for the next merge window?
> V5 is the latest.
> No comment, but not applied.
> 
> Is there anything I can do but wait?

Looks like this one has fallen between the cracks, so sorry about that.

I checked in with Russell, and we'll pick this up for now even if it might
need some minor fixups down the road -- it seems good enough to go in.

Applied v5 of all 3 patches, first two to next/soc, last to next/dt.


Thanks, and apologies for the delay,

-Olof