From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: efi: make sure vmlinux load address aligned on 2MBytes
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:05:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027120520.GA1839@svinekod> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563137DF.1040908@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:02:23PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 10/28/2015 12:26 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>>This does make the kernel boot, but we suspect that there may be
> >>>another problem. We need to investigate it, but we have a suspicion
> >>>that the EFI stub is trying to allocate from the Runtime Data block,
> >>>and the alignment adjustment "fixes" the problem by moving the
> >>>pointer to Conventional Memory.
> >I don't follow. EFI_BOOT_SERVICES.AllocatePages() should only give us
> >pages which are available, so it shouldn't ever return pages which are
> >runtime data -- it would fail and we'd fall back to efi_low_alloc().
> >
> >Could you elaborate?
>
> So we're still debugging this internally, but it turns out that
> dram_base is equal to 0x4000820000, which also happens to be the
> start of a Runtime Data block:
>
> 0x004000820000-0x00400085ffff [Runtime Data |RUN|XP| | |
> |WB|WT|WC|UC]
>
> I think this is not supposed to happen.
It's perfectly valid for that to be detected as dram_base, and the stub may
call AllocatePages() for that region, but AllocatePages() shouldn't
successfully allocate from there.
The stub should fall back to efi_low_alloc, walking through the memory map
until it finds a large enough region to allocate from, with some subsequent
AllocatePages() call eventually succeeding.
Is that not what you're seeing?
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 21:24 [PATCH] arm64: efi: make sure vmlinux load address aligned on 2MBytes Timur Tabi
2015-10-28 2:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-28 2:10 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-28 2:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-28 2:13 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-28 11:28 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-28 17:11 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-28 17:26 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-28 21:02 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-27 12:05 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-10-28 17:27 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027120520.GA1839@svinekod \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).