From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Trustzone: DSB before/after SMC
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:37:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027143706.GF3091@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562F84BA.5060203@free.fr>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:05:46PM +0100, Mason wrote:
> On 27/10/2015 14:43, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:31:38PM +0100, Mason wrote:
> >
> >> I have a few questions about SMC. (I'm using Cortex-A9)
> >>
> >> Platforms that use SMC often/always execute DSB beforehand.
> >
> > Please give an example. We don't do this for PSCI, for instance.
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos-smc.S
> arch/arm/mach-highbank/smc.S
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
>From a quick look, it's not obvious to me why those DSBs are present. It
would be best to ask the original authors; it may simply be that this
was never necessary and has simply been copied.
In particular, the DSB; DMB; SMC sequence in omap_smc2 makes no sense to
me, given that a DSB provides a superset of the guarantees of a DMB. If
the DSB is necessary I don't see that the DMB would also be necessary.
> A few that don't execute DSB before SMC:
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
> arch/arm/mach-keystone/smc.S
>
> >> 1a) Is DSB required before SMC?
> >> 1b) Is DSB required after SMC?
> >> 2a) Is DSB required before returning to non-secure OS?
> >> 2b) Is DSB required after returning to non-secure OS?
> >
> > It depends on what you're trying to achieve, and the design of both the
> > secure and non-secure OS code.
>
> In my case, I just want to write the L2_CONTROL register.
Is that a register in the L2, or in the CPU? Which L2/CPU?
There may be a constraint that the memory system needs to be quiescent
or something to that effect. Without more information I cannot say what
specifically you need to do.
> > A DSB is certainly not always required before nor after an SMC.
>
> That makes sense. But a colleague mentioned that the secure OS may
> be using different MMU mappings. In that case, it might be required
> to wait for all in-flight accesses to resolve?
Are you referring to differing VAs or differing attributes?
For ARMv6 and above the former does not matter; the caches behaves as if
they are PIPT.
The latter may require the use of barriers and/or cache maintenance if
the secure and non-secure OSs are communicating through shared memory.
That's somewhat independent of the SMC itself.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 13:31 Trustzone: DSB before/after SMC Mason
2015-10-27 13:43 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-27 14:05 ` Mason
2015-10-27 14:37 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-10-27 14:54 ` Måns Rullgård
2015-10-27 15:01 ` Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027143706.GF3091@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).