public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: efi: make sure vmlinux load address aligned on 2MBytes
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:26:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151028172619.GA26777@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563101DD.8080508@codeaurora.org>

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:11:57PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 09:06 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
> >index 816120ece6bc..a60ce249cfc0 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
> >+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
> >@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
> >                  * Mustang), we can still place the kernel at the address
> >                  * 'dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET'.
> >                  */
> >-               *image_addr = *reserve_addr = dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET;
> >+               *image_addr = *reserve_addr = round_up(dram_base, SZ_2M) +
> >+                                                      TEXT_OFFSET);
> >                 nr_pages = round_up(kernel_memsize, EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN) /
> >                            EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
> >                 status = efi_call_early(allocate_pages, EFI_ALLOCATE_ADDRESS,
> 
> Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>

I assume with the trailing ')' removed. ;)

With that:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

> However, I think this formatting is easier to read:
> 
> 		*image_addr = *reserve_addr =
> 			round_up(dram_base, SZ_2M) + TEXT_OFFSET;

I have no strong feeling on this either way.

> This does make the kernel boot, but we suspect that there may be
> another problem.  We need to investigate it, but we have a suspicion
> that the EFI stub is trying to allocate from the Runtime Data block,
> and the alignment adjustment "fixes" the problem by moving the
> pointer to Conventional Memory.

I don't follow. EFI_BOOT_SERVICES.AllocatePages() should only give us
pages which are available, so it shouldn't ever return pages which are
runtime data -- it would fail and we'd fall back to efi_low_alloc().

Could you elaborate?

> Anyway, is there any chance we can get this fix into 4.3?  I'd hate
> to have 4.3 released knowing that it's broken on our hardware.

It's probably too late now, but it should certainly be Cc'd stable and
get backported.

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-28 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-27 21:24 [PATCH] arm64: efi: make sure vmlinux load address aligned on 2MBytes Timur Tabi
2015-10-28  2:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-28  2:10   ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-28  2:11     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-28  2:13       ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-28 11:28         ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-28 17:11   ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-28 17:26     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-10-28 21:02       ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-27 12:05         ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-28 17:27     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151028172619.GA26777@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox