From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 14:28:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v11 1/8] arm64: renesas: r8a7795: Add Renesas R8A7795 SoC support In-Reply-To: References: <1444890243-6978-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <1444890243-6978-2-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20151015105820.GF8825@leverpostej> Message-ID: <20151103142810.GC4049@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:34:39PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> > + gic: interrupt-controller at 0xf1010000 { > >> + compatible = "arm,gic-400"; > >> + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > >> + #address-cells = <0>; > >> + interrupt-controller; > >> + reg = <0x0 0xf1010000 0 0x1000>, > >> + <0x0 0xf1020000 0 0x2000>; > >> + interrupts = >> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>; > >> + }; > > > > No GICH and GICV? > > These seem to be defined in the "arm,gic-v3" DT bindings only, while this is > an "arm,gic-400" (GICD_IIDR 0x0200043b)? See the "GIC virtualization extensions (VGIC)" section in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt > I did notice hi6220.dtsi does have GICH and GICV, while it also claims > to be an "arm,gic-400"... That's fine, that's valid for any GICv2 with virtualization extensions. > > Which exception level do CPUs boot at? > > No idea. For reference, the kernel should print it out just after booting all CPUs. e.g. on Juno: SMP: Total of 6 processors activated. CPU: All CPU(s) started at EL2 Thanks, Mark.