From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?=)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 12:40:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT
 "/chosen/linux,atags" entry
In-Reply-To: <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali>
References: <1436214373-12969-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com>
 <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com>
 <20151012201640.GQ23801@atomide.com> <201510122225.12786@pali>
 <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com> <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali>
Message-ID: <20151105114041.GC27908@pali>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar@gmail.com> [151012 13:29]:
> > > On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments
> > > > addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree
> > > > what needs to be done.
> > > 
> > > Tony, I'm not really sure what to do. Just wrap 4 and 5 patches into 
> > > CONFIG_KEXEC? Or something more?
> > 
> > Well for most part your patches are fine, I think there were some
> > minor comments on the series.
> > 
> > For the CONFIG_KEXEC dependency, we should just keep the existing
> > behavior and keep /proc/atags behind CONFIG_KEXEC. That's all
> > I believe :)
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Tony
> > 
> > 
> 
> Ok. I will add CONFIG_KEXEC into atag patches.
> 
> And there is missing documentation for these two new DT properties
> (marked as TODO in commit messages). Where to put them?
> 

Tony (or somebody else) ^^^

-- 
Pali Roh?r
pali.rohar at gmail.com