From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: bpf: add BPF XADD instruction
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:24:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111102406.GB9562@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4902833.k8y8bz0YLV@wuerfel>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 18:52:45 Z Lim wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
> > <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:26:02PM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
> > >> On 11/10/2015 4:08 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >> >On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 14:41 -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > >> >>aarch64 doesn't have native support for XADD instruction, implement it by
> > >> >>the below instruction sequence:
> >
> > aarch64 supports atomic add in ARMv8.1.
> > For ARMv8(.0), please consider using LDXR/STXR sequence.
>
> Is it worth optimizing for the 8.1 case? It would add a bit of complexity
> to make the code depend on the CPU feature, but it's certainly doable.
What's the atomicity required for? Put another way, what are we racing
with (I thought bpf was single-threaded)? Do we need to worry about
memory barriers?
Apologies if these are stupid questions, but all I could find was
samples/bpf/sock_example.c and it didn't help much :(
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 22:41 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: bpf: add BPF_ST and BPF_XADD instructions support Yang Shi
2015-11-10 22:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: bpf: add 'store immediate' instruction Yang Shi
2015-11-11 2:45 ` Z Lim
2015-11-11 12:12 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 12:39 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-12 19:33 ` Shi, Yang
2015-11-13 3:45 ` Z Lim
2015-11-23 19:34 ` Shi, Yang
2015-11-10 22:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: bpf: add BPF XADD instruction Yang Shi
2015-11-11 0:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-11 0:26 ` Shi, Yang
2015-11-11 0:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-11 2:52 ` Z Lim
2015-11-11 8:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-11 10:24 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-11-11 10:42 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 11:58 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 12:21 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 12:38 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 15:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 16:23 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 17:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-11 17:35 ` David Miller
2015-11-11 17:44 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 19:01 ` David Miller
2015-11-11 17:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-11 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 19:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-11 22:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 23:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-12 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:50 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 19:04 ` David Miller
2015-11-11 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 19:41 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 18:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 19:01 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151111102406.GB9562@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).