linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: bpf: add BPF XADD instruction
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:24:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111102406.GB9562@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4902833.k8y8bz0YLV@wuerfel>

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 18:52:45 Z Lim wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
> > <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:26:02PM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
> > >> On 11/10/2015 4:08 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >> >On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 14:41 -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > >> >>aarch64 doesn't have native support for XADD instruction, implement it by
> > >> >>the below instruction sequence:
> > 
> > aarch64 supports atomic add in ARMv8.1.
> > For ARMv8(.0), please consider using LDXR/STXR sequence.
> 
> Is it worth optimizing for the 8.1 case? It would add a bit of complexity
> to make the code depend on the CPU feature, but it's certainly doable.

What's the atomicity required for? Put another way, what are we racing
with (I thought bpf was single-threaded)? Do we need to worry about
memory barriers?

Apologies if these are stupid questions, but all I could find was
samples/bpf/sock_example.c and it didn't help much :(

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-11 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-10 22:41 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: bpf: add BPF_ST and BPF_XADD instructions support Yang Shi
2015-11-10 22:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: bpf: add 'store immediate' instruction Yang Shi
2015-11-11  2:45   ` Z Lim
2015-11-11 12:12     ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 12:39       ` Will Deacon
2015-11-12 19:33         ` Shi, Yang
2015-11-13  3:45           ` Z Lim
2015-11-23 19:34             ` Shi, Yang
2015-11-10 22:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: bpf: add BPF XADD instruction Yang Shi
2015-11-11  0:08   ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-11  0:26     ` Shi, Yang
2015-11-11  0:42       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-11  2:52         ` Z Lim
2015-11-11  8:49           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-11 10:24             ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-11-11 10:42               ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 11:58                 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 12:21                   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 12:38                     ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 12:58                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 15:52                         ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 16:23                           ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 17:27                             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-11 17:35                               ` David Miller
2015-11-11 17:44                                 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 19:01                                   ` David Miller
2015-11-11 17:57                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:11                                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-11 18:31                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:41                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:44                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:54                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 19:55                                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-11 22:21                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 23:40                                               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-12  8:57                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 18:50                                       ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 19:04                                         ` David Miller
2015-11-11 19:23                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-11 19:41                                           ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-11 18:46                                     ` Will Deacon
2015-11-11 19:01                                     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151111102406.GB9562@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).