From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:29:15 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v11 4/5] arm64: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT,
 PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511101410550.5676@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511051502270.13541@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
 <1446737696-9749-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511101410550.5676@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Message-ID: <20151117172914.GL30101@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:11:38PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM64.
> > Necessary duplication of paravirt.h and paravirt.c with ARM.
> > 
> > The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no
> > runtime pvops patching needed.
> > 
> > This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen
> > ticks accounting.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> 
> Ping?
> 
> Catalin, Will,
> are you happy with this change?

I'm happy if Marc's happy. Marc?

Will