[RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: imx6: change default burst size for USB

[peter.chen@freescale.com (Peter Chen)]

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> Am Dienstag, den 20.10.2015, 15:07 +0800 schrieb Peter Chen:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:37:12PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:52:39AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > > Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2015, 10:17 +0800 schrieb Peter Chen:
> > > > > It can improve the USB performance when choosing larger
> > > > > burst size at some systems (bus size is larger), there is
> > > > > no side effect if this burst size is larger than bus size.
> > > > > 
> > > > Just for the record, as it seems too late to stop the train now:
> > > > 
> > > > I am _NOT_ happy that the extended binding has been accepted into the
> > > > USB tree despite outstanding review comments from me not being addressed
> > > > or even answered.
> > > 
> > > Okay.  I'm not aware of this.  I'm dropping the patches until everyone
> > > agrees with it.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Shawn & Lucas, I sent the improvement patch for dt description following 
> > Lucas's comment one week ago at below:
> > 
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg131150.html
> > 
> > If no more comments, queue my dts patches please.
> > 
> While the binding hasn't received a good review in time it is already in
> a released kernel and I'm not going to argue to change it now after the
> fact (violating the DT stability rules) just to satisfy my rather minor
> comments. I want to make clear that I was not happy by how this stuff
> has been handled with the USB tree and it is my hope that this can be
> improved for future binding changes.
> 
> But please don't hold those DTS patches any longer. The binding is in,
> there is no point in not applying the corresponding patches.
> 
> Regards,
> Lucas
> 

Ping...

Shawn, I still not see these dt changes in your tree

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen