linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles using the SPI Wait Clock Register
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:45:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151122194556.GO32142@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGNoLaPLXOmObXgW0YsN8giM1WCRDn7MieTBcKOE5sjXbjg0GA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:45:48PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote:
> 2015-11-20 17:12 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote:
> >> > (and the wdelay should
> >> > arguably be a core-spi thing, not a sunxi thing, but that's a separate
> >> > discussion)
> >>
> >> I've been thinking about that, but it seemed to big a change to
> >> attempt with my limited kernel hacking experience.
> >
> > It is not any bigger. You just need to document it in the core binding.
> > It would still be read by the drivers using it.
> 
> Julien, Rob: thanks for your comments! Ok, I will make the following changes:
> 
> - remove "sun4i,spi-wdelay" from the sun4i binding and add the
> property to the spi-bus.txt binding instead
> - remove the comment about the additional 3 cycles from the documentation
> - modfy the spi-sun4i driver to take care of the minimum 3 cycle period
> 
> Does that sound right?
> 
> And maybe I could also use a more descriptive name for the property,
> maybe "spi-word-wait-cycles"?

I don't think it should be in a clock-rate dependant unit. Using micro
or nano-seconds would be more appropriate I guess.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151122/c8e5db67/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-22 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-19 15:53 [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-19 15:53 ` [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles using the SPI Wait Clock Register Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-19 22:59   ` [linux-sunxi] " Julian Calaby
2015-11-20  8:45     ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20 10:12       ` Julian Calaby
2015-11-20 13:56         ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20 16:12           ` Rob Herring
2015-11-20 16:45             ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-22 19:45               ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2015-11-23  9:14                 ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20 16:03   ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151122194556.GO32142@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).