From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk (Matt Fleming) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 21:21:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 13/13] ARM: add UEFI stub support In-Reply-To: References: <1448269593-20758-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1448269593-20758-14-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20151126104711.GH2765@codeblueprint.co.uk> Message-ID: <20151127212155.GC13918@codeblueprint.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 27 Nov, at 10:38:05AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Actually, it is the reservation done a bit earlier that could > potentially end up at 0x0, and the [compressed] kernel is always at > least 32 MB up in memory, so that it can be decompressed as close to > the base of DRAM as possible. > > As far as I can tell, efi_free() deals correctly with allocations at > address 0x0, and that is the only dealing we have with the > reservation. So I don't think there is an issue here. OK, great.