From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: Move kill_cpu_early to smp.c
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:31:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151201163138.GA29045@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565DC5DB.7070905@arm.com>
> >>+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> >>+ /* Check if we can park ourselves */
> >>+ if (cpu_ops[cpu] && cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_die)
> >>+ cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_die(cpu);
> >>+#endif
> >
> >Is there no way we can synchronise against this from another CPU, to be
> >sure that this CPU is actually gone?
>
> Unfortunately, no. It cannot be guaranteed whether the CPU died gracefully
> or is held up in the kernel. All the other CPU can find is whether the
> CPU successfully turned online or not (using a wait_for_completion_timeout).
That's true if we only consider the kernel, but the firmware can help
us.
For PSCI 0.2+ we can query AFFINITY_INFO to discover whether a CPU is
whether or not it is in the firmware (i.e. whether or not it is
potentially in the kernel), so we can certainly query this in some
cases.
We already do this in the usual hotplug-off case; see cpu_kill.
> >>+
> >>+ asm(
> >>+ "1: wfe\n"
> >>+ " wfi\n"
> >>+ " b 1b");
> >>+}
> >
> >This can be:
> >
> >for (;;) {
> > wfe();
> > wfi();
> >}
>
> Nice, I will change it.
>
> >
> >Regardless of that, we now have a CPU stuck in the kernel, despite
> >beleiving it to be !present (and therefore !online).
>
> Right, the CPU could be spinning in the kernel.
>
> >
> >This is problematic for anything where we need to offline or stop
> >secondary CPUs. For instance, we need to inhibit kexec here (as we will
> >also need to in case CPUs were stuck in the spinning due to spin-table).
>
> Correct, I didn't think about kexec. May be we could indicate the result
> back (that we are looping in kernel) in secondary_data and that could solve
> the synchronisation part ?
I think we need to have two flags, a cpu-must-die flag in secondary
data, and a global stuck-in-the-kernel flag.
The CPU wanting to die could set its cpu-must-die flag, signal the
completion, then cpu_die(). The CPU awaiting the completion would then
check cpu-must-die, and if so, cpu_kill() that CPU. If not set, we had a
successful onlining.
We need stuck-in-the-kernel flag to account for CPUs which didn't manage
to turn the MMU on (which are either in the spin-table, or failed when
they were individually onlined).
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 15:12 [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: cpufeature: Add sanity check for ASIDBits Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: Introduce kill_cpu_early Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: Move kill_cpu_early to smp.c Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 15:28 ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-01 16:07 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 16:31 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-12-01 17:38 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 17:52 ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-01 18:10 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 18:50 ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-03 16:36 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-03 17:08 ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-01 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: Enable CPU capability verification for !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: Add hook for checking early CPU features Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Add helper for extracting ASIDBits Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: Ensure the secondary CPUs have safe ASIDBits size Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-01 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: cpufeature: Add sanity check for ASIDBits Suzuki K. Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151201163138.GA29045@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).