From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:07:30 +0530
Subject: [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter
 mapping to slave devices
In-Reply-To: <1589780.JL62pLTh05@wuerfel>
References: <1448891145-10766-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <1448891145-10766-5-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <20151201172212.GC1696@localhost> <1589780.JL62pLTh05@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <20151202043730.GA1854@localhost>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:20:28PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 December 2015 22:52:12 Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:45:34PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > Add support for providing device to filter_fn mapping so client drivers
> > > can switch to use the dma_request_chan() API.
> > 
> > Any reason why we dont want to go with DT based only for edma here?
> 
> I think the OMAP2 based platforms using edma are all DT-only, but mach-davinci
> would need a lot of work for that.

Okay sound fine then

-- 
~Vinod