From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:16:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202131659.GA5621@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202123654.GC4523@arm.com>
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:36:54PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:50:09PM +0800, Li Bin wrote:
> > On arm64, kstop_machine which is hugely disruptive to a running
> > system is not needed to convert nops to ftrace calls or back,
> > because that modifed code is a single 32bit instructions which
> > is impossible to cross cache (or page) boundaries, and the used str
> > instruction is single-copy atomic.
>
> This commit message is misleading, since the single-copy atomicity
> guarantees don't apply to the instruction-side. Instead, the architecture
> calls out a handful of safe instructions in "Concurrent modification and
> execution of instructions".
>
> Now, those safe instructions *do* include NOP, B and BL, so that should
> be sufficient for ftrace provided that we don't patch condition codes
> (and I don't think we do).
Thinking about this some more, you also need to fix the validate=1 case
in ftrace_modify_code so that it can run outside of stop_machine. We
currently rely on that to deal with concurrent modifications (e.g.
module unloading).
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-28 7:50 [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing Li Bin
2015-11-28 15:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-30 2:03 ` libin
2015-12-02 12:36 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-02 13:16 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-12-03 9:39 ` libin
2015-12-03 11:48 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-02 14:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 9:21 ` libin
2015-12-03 9:38 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:09 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-04 1:00 ` libin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151202131659.GA5621@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).