From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:57:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v6 14/19] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate
 table (in entry.S) to use it
In-Reply-To: <7159845.QvBivUPZSS@wuerfel>
References: <1447795019-30176-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
 <20151202103522.GB21461@yury-N73SV> <2623148.F7bGmbuQQh@wuerfel>
 <7159845.QvBivUPZSS@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <20151202135757.GA6367@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:54:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 December 2015 14:46:32 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 December 2015 13:35:22 Yury Norov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:37:05AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > The 4*PAGE_SIZE on ARM is an architecture specific oddity, I believe
> > > > to work around aliasing caches on ARMv6. As no other architecture does
> > > > this, we're probably better off not duplicating it for aarch64-ilp32
> > > > and just use sys_shmat as your v6 patch does.
> > > >       Arnd
> > > 
> > > If you feel ARMv6 fix for caches will come soon, just ignore it.
> > > Otherwise, please pull it because compat_sys_shmat is broken now
> > > for 64K pages.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
> > > 
> > 
> > Sounds good. Will, do you want to take this for the arm64 tree.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> (actually Cc Will Deacon)
> 
> Will or Catalin, does this look ok to you?

Looks ok on the face of it (although I haven't tried compat w/ 64k pages).

I'll take it via the arm64 tree with your ack.

Cheers,

Will