From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:53:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix pinctrl driver selection In-Reply-To: <5661CE71.5050206@arm.com> References: <1449249513-22972-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <5661CE71.5050206@arm.com> Message-ID: <20151204175357.GD3515@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/12/2015 at 17:33:37 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote : > > > On 04/12/15 17:18, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > >From: Ludovic Desroches > > > >Move the selection of the pinctrl driver to SoC family level since we > >have two pinctrl drivers. It is useless to select one which is not > >compatible with the SoC. > > > >[abelloni: fixed pm.c when only sama2d2 is selected] > >Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > >Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre > >Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > >--- > > arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 6 +++++- > > arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 7 ++++++- > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > [...] > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c > >index 80e277cfcc8b..01cbb17e6f6b 100644 > >--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c > >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c > >@@ -41,8 +41,10 @@ > > * implementation should be moved down into the pinctrl driver and get > > * called as part of the generic suspend/resume path. > > */ > >+#ifdef PINCTRL_AT91 > > Accidentally glanced at this patch when my mail client got hung at this > patch :), I think you mean CONFIG_PINCTRL_AT91 here and later below. > Raah, sure. Thanks! > -- > Regards, > Sudeep -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com