* [PATCH v5] clk: sunxi: Add CLK_OF_DECLARE support for sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver
@ 2015-12-03 7:05 Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-07 9:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-12-09 9:17 ` Maxime Ripard
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2015-12-03 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The APBS clock on sun9i is the same as the APB0 clock on sun8i. With
sun9i we are supporting the PRCM clocks by using CLK_OF_DECLARE,
instead of through a PRCM mfd device and subdevices for each clock
and reset control. As such we need a CLK_OF_DECLARE version of
the sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver.
Also, build it for sun9i/A80, and not just for configurations with
MFD_SUN6I_PRCM enabled.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
---
Changes since v4:
- Keep building clk-sun8i-apb0 for SUN6I_MFD_PRCM.
- Add an error message and comment for when of_io_request_and_map()
fails. of_io_request_and_map() merges a bunch of errors into -EINVAL,
so this might not be the best approach. But I think having an error
message when we know something is wrong (-EBUSY, -ENOMEM) is better.
---
drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
index 103efab05ca8..ccf21ba3b6b0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-y += clk-sun9i-core.o
obj-y += clk-sun9i-mmc.o
obj-y += clk-usb.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun8i-apb0.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun9i-cpus.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SUN6I_PRCM) += \
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
index 7ae5d2c2cde1..7ba61103a6f5 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
@@ -17,13 +17,77 @@
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+static struct clk *sun8i_a23_apb0_register(struct device_node *node,
+ void __iomem *reg)
+{
+ const char *clk_name = node->name;
+ const char *clk_parent;
+ struct clk *clk;
+ int ret;
+
+ clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
+ if (!clk_parent)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
+
+ /* The A23 APB0 clock is a standard 2 bit wide divider clock */
+ clk = clk_register_divider(NULL, clk_name, clk_parent, 0, reg,
+ 0, 2, CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(clk))
+ return clk;
+
+ ret = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_unregister;
+
+ return clk;
+
+err_unregister:
+ clk_unregister_divider(clk);
+
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+
+static void sun8i_a23_apb0_setup(struct device_node *node)
+{
+ void __iomem *reg;
+ struct resource res;
+ struct clk *clk;
+
+ reg = of_io_request_and_map(node, 0, of_node_full_name(node));
+ if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
+ /*
+ * This happens with clk nodes instantiated through mfd,
+ * as those do not have their resources assigned in the
+ * device tree. Do not print an error in this case.
+ */
+ if (PTR_ERR(reg) != -EINVAL)
+ pr_err("Could not get registers for a23-apb0-clk\n");
+
+ return;
+ }
+
+ clk = sun8i_a23_apb0_register(node, reg);
+ if (IS_ERR(clk))
+ goto err_unmap;
+
+ return;
+
+err_unmap:
+ iounmap(reg);
+ of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
+ release_mem_region(res.start, resource_size(&res));
+}
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a23_apb0, "allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb0-clk",
+ sun8i_a23_apb0_setup);
+
static int sun8i_a23_apb0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
- const char *clk_name = np->name;
- const char *clk_parent;
struct resource *r;
void __iomem *reg;
struct clk *clk;
@@ -33,19 +97,11 @@ static int sun8i_a23_apb0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(reg))
return PTR_ERR(reg);
- clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
- if (!clk_parent)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- of_property_read_string(np, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
-
- /* The A23 APB0 clock is a standard 2 bit wide divider clock */
- clk = clk_register_divider(&pdev->dev, clk_name, clk_parent, 0, reg,
- 0, 2, CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL);
+ clk = sun8i_a23_apb0_register(np, reg);
if (IS_ERR(clk))
return PTR_ERR(clk);
- return of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
+ return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id sun8i_a23_apb0_clk_dt_ids[] = {
--
2.6.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5] clk: sunxi: Add CLK_OF_DECLARE support for sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver
2015-12-03 7:05 [PATCH v5] clk: sunxi: Add CLK_OF_DECLARE support for sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver Chen-Yu Tsai
@ 2015-12-07 9:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-12-07 13:46 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-09 9:17 ` Maxime Ripard
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2015-12-07 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:05:30PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The APBS clock on sun9i is the same as the APB0 clock on sun8i. With
> sun9i we are supporting the PRCM clocks by using CLK_OF_DECLARE,
> instead of through a PRCM mfd device and subdevices for each clock
> and reset control. As such we need a CLK_OF_DECLARE version of
> the sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver.
>
> Also, build it for sun9i/A80, and not just for configurations with
> MFD_SUN6I_PRCM enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> ---
>
> Changes since v4:
>
> - Keep building clk-sun8i-apb0 for SUN6I_MFD_PRCM.
>
> - Add an error message and comment for when of_io_request_and_map()
> fails. of_io_request_and_map() merges a bunch of errors into -EINVAL,
> so this might not be the best approach. But I think having an error
> message when we know something is wrong (-EBUSY, -ENOMEM) is better.
>
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
> index 103efab05ca8..ccf21ba3b6b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-y += clk-sun9i-core.o
> obj-y += clk-sun9i-mmc.o
> obj-y += clk-usb.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun8i-apb0.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun9i-cpus.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SUN6I_PRCM) += \
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
> index 7ae5d2c2cde1..7ba61103a6f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
> @@ -17,13 +17,77 @@
> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> +static struct clk *sun8i_a23_apb0_register(struct device_node *node,
> + void __iomem *reg)
> +{
> + const char *clk_name = node->name;
> + const char *clk_parent;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + int ret;
> +
> + clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
> + if (!clk_parent)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
> +
> + /* The A23 APB0 clock is a standard 2 bit wide divider clock */
> + clk = clk_register_divider(NULL, clk_name, clk_parent, 0, reg,
> + 0, 2, CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> + return clk;
> +
> + ret = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_unregister;
> +
> + return clk;
> +
> +err_unregister:
> + clk_unregister_divider(clk);
> +
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> +
> +static void sun8i_a23_apb0_setup(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + void __iomem *reg;
> + struct resource res;
> + struct clk *clk;
> +
> + reg = of_io_request_and_map(node, 0, of_node_full_name(node));
> + if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
> + /*
> + * This happens with clk nodes instantiated through mfd,
> + * as those do not have their resources assigned in the
> + * device tree. Do not print an error in this case.
> + */
> + if (PTR_ERR(reg) != -EINVAL)
> + pr_err("Could not get registers for a23-apb0-clk\n");
This is not the only case you have to take into account.
There's also the case when you have a regular clock (and by regular I
mean that is not in the PRCM) that will be probed by the
CLK_OF_DECLARE mechanism and then later by the device model.
In such a case, the second of_io_request_and_map will fail, and you
will have an error returned that you do not ignore at the moment.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151207/33e31ae4/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5] clk: sunxi: Add CLK_OF_DECLARE support for sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver
2015-12-07 9:36 ` Maxime Ripard
@ 2015-12-07 13:46 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-09 9:16 ` Maxime Ripard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2015-12-07 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:05:30PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> The APBS clock on sun9i is the same as the APB0 clock on sun8i. With
>> sun9i we are supporting the PRCM clocks by using CLK_OF_DECLARE,
>> instead of through a PRCM mfd device and subdevices for each clock
>> and reset control. As such we need a CLK_OF_DECLARE version of
>> the sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver.
>>
>> Also, build it for sun9i/A80, and not just for configurations with
>> MFD_SUN6I_PRCM enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>>
>> - Keep building clk-sun8i-apb0 for SUN6I_MFD_PRCM.
>>
>> - Add an error message and comment for when of_io_request_and_map()
>> fails. of_io_request_and_map() merges a bunch of errors into -EINVAL,
>> so this might not be the best approach. But I think having an error
>> message when we know something is wrong (-EBUSY, -ENOMEM) is better.
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
>> index 103efab05ca8..ccf21ba3b6b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-y += clk-sun9i-core.o
>> obj-y += clk-sun9i-mmc.o
>> obj-y += clk-usb.o
>>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun8i-apb0.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun9i-cpus.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SUN6I_PRCM) += \
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
>> index 7ae5d2c2cde1..7ba61103a6f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
>> @@ -17,13 +17,77 @@
>> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>
>> +static struct clk *sun8i_a23_apb0_register(struct device_node *node,
>> + void __iomem *reg)
>> +{
>> + const char *clk_name = node->name;
>> + const char *clk_parent;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
>> + if (!clk_parent)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
>> +
>> + /* The A23 APB0 clock is a standard 2 bit wide divider clock */
>> + clk = clk_register_divider(NULL, clk_name, clk_parent, 0, reg,
>> + 0, 2, CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
>> + return clk;
>> +
>> + ret = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_unregister;
>> +
>> + return clk;
>> +
>> +err_unregister:
>> + clk_unregister_divider(clk);
>> +
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sun8i_a23_apb0_setup(struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *reg;
>> + struct resource res;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> +
>> + reg = of_io_request_and_map(node, 0, of_node_full_name(node));
>> + if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
>> + /*
>> + * This happens with clk nodes instantiated through mfd,
>> + * as those do not have their resources assigned in the
>> + * device tree. Do not print an error in this case.
>> + */
>> + if (PTR_ERR(reg) != -EINVAL)
>> + pr_err("Could not get registers for a23-apb0-clk\n");
>
> This is not the only case you have to take into account.
>
> There's also the case when you have a regular clock (and by regular I
> mean that is not in the PRCM) that will be probed by the
> CLK_OF_DECLARE mechanism and then later by the device model.
>
> In such a case, the second of_io_request_and_map will fail, and you
> will have an error returned that you do not ignore at the moment.
Right. It will return -EBUSY. But ignoring it and returning 0 is telling
the driver core that the device successfully binded. I think this is
wrong.
Normal clocks should be in the "clocks" node, and wouldn't be probed a
second time through the device model, would it? Am I missing something?
ChenYu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5] clk: sunxi: Add CLK_OF_DECLARE support for sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver
2015-12-07 13:46 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
@ 2015-12-09 9:16 ` Maxime Ripard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2015-12-09 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:46:24PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:05:30PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> The APBS clock on sun9i is the same as the APB0 clock on sun8i. With
> >> sun9i we are supporting the PRCM clocks by using CLK_OF_DECLARE,
> >> instead of through a PRCM mfd device and subdevices for each clock
> >> and reset control. As such we need a CLK_OF_DECLARE version of
> >> the sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver.
> >>
> >> Also, build it for sun9i/A80, and not just for configurations with
> >> MFD_SUN6I_PRCM enabled.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes since v4:
> >>
> >> - Keep building clk-sun8i-apb0 for SUN6I_MFD_PRCM.
> >>
> >> - Add an error message and comment for when of_io_request_and_map()
> >> fails. of_io_request_and_map() merges a bunch of errors into -EINVAL,
> >> so this might not be the best approach. But I think having an error
> >> message when we know something is wrong (-EBUSY, -ENOMEM) is better.
> >>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
> >> index 103efab05ca8..ccf21ba3b6b0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
> >> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-y += clk-sun9i-core.o
> >> obj-y += clk-sun9i-mmc.o
> >> obj-y += clk-usb.o
> >>
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun8i-apb0.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun9i-cpus.o
> >>
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SUN6I_PRCM) += \
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
> >> index 7ae5d2c2cde1..7ba61103a6f5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c
> >> @@ -17,13 +17,77 @@
> >> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> >> #include <linux/module.h>
> >> #include <linux/of.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> >> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>
> >> +static struct clk *sun8i_a23_apb0_register(struct device_node *node,
> >> + void __iomem *reg)
> >> +{
> >> + const char *clk_name = node->name;
> >> + const char *clk_parent;
> >> + struct clk *clk;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
> >> + if (!clk_parent)
> >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >> +
> >> + of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
> >> +
> >> + /* The A23 APB0 clock is a standard 2 bit wide divider clock */
> >> + clk = clk_register_divider(NULL, clk_name, clk_parent, 0, reg,
> >> + 0, 2, CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> >> + return clk;
> >> +
> >> + ret = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto err_unregister;
> >> +
> >> + return clk;
> >> +
> >> +err_unregister:
> >> + clk_unregister_divider(clk);
> >> +
> >> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void sun8i_a23_apb0_setup(struct device_node *node)
> >> +{
> >> + void __iomem *reg;
> >> + struct resource res;
> >> + struct clk *clk;
> >> +
> >> + reg = of_io_request_and_map(node, 0, of_node_full_name(node));
> >> + if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
> >> + /*
> >> + * This happens with clk nodes instantiated through mfd,
> >> + * as those do not have their resources assigned in the
> >> + * device tree. Do not print an error in this case.
> >> + */
> >> + if (PTR_ERR(reg) != -EINVAL)
> >> + pr_err("Could not get registers for a23-apb0-clk\n");
> >
> > This is not the only case you have to take into account.
> >
> > There's also the case when you have a regular clock (and by regular I
> > mean that is not in the PRCM) that will be probed by the
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE mechanism and then later by the device model.
> >
> > In such a case, the second of_io_request_and_map will fail, and you
> > will have an error returned that you do not ignore at the moment.
>
> Right. It will return -EBUSY. But ignoring it and returning 0 is telling
> the driver core that the device successfully binded. I think this is
> wrong.
Well, technically, it is already bound.
> Normal clocks should be in the "clocks" node, and wouldn't be probed a
> second time through the device model, would it? Am I missing something?
Hmmm, that's true.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151209/574d0975/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5] clk: sunxi: Add CLK_OF_DECLARE support for sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver
2015-12-03 7:05 [PATCH v5] clk: sunxi: Add CLK_OF_DECLARE support for sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-07 9:36 ` Maxime Ripard
@ 2015-12-09 9:17 ` Maxime Ripard
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2015-12-09 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:05:30PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The APBS clock on sun9i is the same as the APB0 clock on sun8i. With
> sun9i we are supporting the PRCM clocks by using CLK_OF_DECLARE,
> instead of through a PRCM mfd device and subdevices for each clock
> and reset control. As such we need a CLK_OF_DECLARE version of
> the sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver.
>
> Also, build it for sun9i/A80, and not just for configurations with
> MFD_SUN6I_PRCM enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Applied, thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151209/dca9d3d5/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-09 9:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-03 7:05 [PATCH v5] clk: sunxi: Add CLK_OF_DECLARE support for sun8i-a23-apb0-clk driver Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-07 9:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-12-07 13:46 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-09 9:16 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-12-09 9:17 ` Maxime Ripard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).