From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ARM64: kernel oops in 4.4-rc4+
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:49:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208134951.GI19612@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVPgTPYzHj0E7cSx=X+=t=0Am_yBSk6FnTZHeG0hyY6ipg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:08:32PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:30:33PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> The attached kernel oops can be triggered immediately after
> >> running the following command on APM Mustang:
> >>
> >> $stress-ng --all 8 -t 10m
> >>
> >> [1] kernel oops log
> >> stress-ng: info: [5220] 5 failures reached, aborting stress process
> >> [ 265.782659] kernel BUG at ./arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:282!
> >
> > Yikes, this means we're replacing a writable pte with a clean pte, so
> > there's a potential race w/ hardware DBM.
> >
> > Could you dump pte and *ptep please?
>
> They are dumped as so:
>
> set_pte_at: addr 470000, ptep fffffe00bc870238, *ptep 680047348a0bd3,
> pte 680047348a0fd3
Thanks for dumping these.
It looks like we're trying to set the access flag in the pte, so its
got nothing to do with swp entries (although they may well be broken
anyway with these BUG_ONs). With H/W DBM enabled, we shouldn't be doing
software management of the access flag, so the BUG_ON looks like a red
herring in this case.
I'm not sure on the best fix for this, though. We can either make the
BUG_ON dependent on the hardware supporting DBM or we could override
ptep_set_access_flags to avoid the debug check.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 6:30 ARM64: kernel oops in 4.4-rc4+ Ming Lei
2015-12-08 10:30 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 10:51 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 12:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-08 13:08 ` Ming Lei
2015-12-08 13:49 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-12-08 16:08 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151208134951.GI19612@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).