From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: split off early mapping code from early_fixmap_init()
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:51:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208135139.GJ19612@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-gvCy73ake0WFErYwP5f5pRAcXs_S1epiG53xs+Fz7Sg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:29:33PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 8 December 2015 at 13:40, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:18:40PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> Apologies that it's taken me so long to get around to this...
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:23:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> > This splits off and generalises the population of the statically
> >> > allocated fixmap page tables so that we may reuse it later for
> >> > the linear mapping once we move the kernel text mapping out of it.
> >> >
> >> > This also involves taking into account that table entries at any of
> >> > the levels we are populating may have been populated already, since
> >> > the fixmap mapping might not be disjoint up to the pgd level anymore
> >> > from other early mappings.
> >>
> >> As a heads-up, for avoiding TLB conflicts, I'm currently working on
> >> alternative way of creating the kernel page tables which will definitely
> >> conflict here, and may or may not supercede this approach.
> >
> > Given that the Christmas break is around the corner and your TLB series
> > is probably going to take some time to get right, I suggest we persevere
> > with Ard's current patch series for 4.5 and merge the TLB conflict solution
> > for 4.6. I don't want us to end up in a situation where this is needlessly
> > blocked on something that isn't quite ready.
> >
> > Any objections? If not, Ard -- can you post a new version of this, please?
> >
>
> Happy to post a new version, with the following remarks
> - my current private tree has evolved in the mean time, and I am now
> putting the kernel image at the base of the vmalloc region (and the
> module region right before)
> - I think Mark's changes would allow me to deobfuscate the VA bias
> that redirects __va() translations into the kernel VA space rather
> than the linear mapping
I'll leave that up to you. I'm just trying to avoid you growing a dependency
on something that's unlikely to make it for 4.5. If Mark separates out the
parts you need, perhaps that offers us some middle ground.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-16 11:23 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: relax Image placement rules Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] of/fdt: make memblock minimum physical address arch configurable Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: use more granular reservations for static page table allocations Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: split off early mapping code from early_fixmap_init() Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-03 12:18 ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-03 13:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-03 13:59 ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-03 14:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-07 16:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-07 16:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-08 12:40 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 13:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-08 13:51 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-12-15 19:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: mm: explicitly bootstrap the linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: move kernel mapping out of linear region Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-07 12:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-07 12:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-07 12:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-07 15:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-16 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: map linear region as non-executable Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-07 16:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-07 16:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-07 16:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-16 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: allow kernel Image to be loaded anywhere in physical memory Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-07 15:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-07 15:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-07 16:43 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151208135139.GJ19612@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).