From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:03:34 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] arm/arm64: add arm-smccc
In-Reply-To: <1449581315-14519-2-git-send-email-jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
References: <1449581315-14519-1-git-send-email-jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
 <1449581315-14519-2-git-send-email-jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20151208150334.GD8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:28:32PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index c24b6f7..8d5a7b0 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -2061,3 +2061,6 @@ config ASN1
>  	  functions to call on what tags.
>  
>  source "kernel/Kconfig.locks"
> +
> +config HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> +	bool

I'm not sure why this has ended up in init/Kconfig - I suspect others
will end up wondering the same.  arch/Kconfig looks to be a better
place for it which is likely to be less controversial.  Please could
you move it there?

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.