From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:25:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] ARM: STi: Register CPUFreq device
In-Reply-To: <3682335.fAt9xNcJFr@wuerfel>
References: <1449585124-15596-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <1449585124-15596-9-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <3682335.fAt9xNcJFr@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <20151209112536.GB17876@x1>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Tuesday 08 December 2015 14:32:01 Lee Jones wrote:
> > @@ -161,3 +166,11 @@ struct smp_operations __initdata sti_smp_ops = {
> >         .smp_secondary_init     = sti_secondary_init,
> >         .smp_boot_secondary     = sti_boot_secondary,
> >  };
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * CPUFreq Registration
> > + */
> > +void init_cpufreq(void)
> > +{
> > +       platform_device_register_simple("sti-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +}
> > 
> 
> Can you please do this under drivers/cpufreq somewhere?
> 
> I really don't want to any more of these in platform code. Requiring a
> device to be created just to probe the driver is really silly.

Already on it.  Bear with.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog