From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:29:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4 01/13] mm/memblock: add MEMBLOCK_NOMAP attribute to memblock memory table In-Reply-To: <20151208142341.b91ab5728f244a68231e3b87@linux-foundation.org> References: <1448886507-3216-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1448886507-3216-2-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20151208120743.GG19612@arm.com> <20151208142341.b91ab5728f244a68231e3b87@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: <20151209112926.GA9303@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:23:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:07:44 +0000 Will Deacon wrote: > > > > I should note that this change should not affect any memblock users > > > that never set the MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag, but please, if you see any > > > issues beyond 'this may conflict with other stuff we have queued for > > > 4.5', please do let me know. > > > > Indeed, I can't see that this would cause any issues, but I would really > > like an Ack from one of the MM maintainers before taking this. > > > > Please could somebody take a look? > > It looks OK to me. Please go ahead and merge it via an arm tree. Will do, thanks Andrew. Will