From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:49:50 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 004/182] gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct In-Reply-To: <1449666760-29876-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> References: <1449666760-29876-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20151209194950.GA23396@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Linus Walleij [151209 05:14]: > The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both > by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and > for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip > is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several > steps of dereferencing necessary. > > Make things simpler: include the fields directly into > , #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and > get rid of the altogether. Prefix > some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper > kerneldoc while we're at it. > > Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct > gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all > container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and > registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). ... > --- > ARM SoC folks and Lee: it would be great if you could > ACK the few lines hitting arch/arm/* and drivers/mfd/* in this > so I can take it through the GPIO tree. For omap: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren