From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com (Paul Gortmaker) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:29:50 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/tty: make more bool drivers explicitly non-modular In-Reply-To: <1445206878-12455-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> References: <1445206878-12455-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Message-ID: <20151215222950.GH2772@windriver.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org [[PATCH 0/5] drivers/tty: make more bool drivers explicitly non-modular] On 18/10/2015 (Sun 18:21) Paul Gortmaker wrote: > This next set of patches to drivers/tty fixes up more drivers that would > perhaps appear modular when looking at the code, but are controlled by > a bool Kconfig. We make sure they don't look modular and get rid > of module related code in the drivers that would never be used. [...] > Paul Gortmaker (5): > drivers/tty: make hvc/hvc_vio.c explicitly non-modular > drivers/tty: make ehv_bytechan.c explicitly non-modular > drivers/tty/serial: make serial/atmel_serial.c explicitly non-modular > drivers/tty/serial: make msm_serial.c explicitly non-modular > drivers/tty/serial: make 8250/8250_mtk.c explicitly non-modular Hi Greg, You've merged the #3 atmel patch and #5 the 8250_mtk patch; the msm_serial patch (#4) is no longer applicable since the authors changed it to tristate. That leaves the top two patches; both for PPC hardware. Did you skip those because you wanted them pushed through the powerpc tree? If so, that is fine, I can do that. Just let me know. Thanks, Paul. -- > > drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c | 40 +++------------------------------ > drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_vio.c | 29 ++++-------------------- > drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c | 35 ++++++----------------------- > drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 45 ++++---------------------------------- > drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 30 ++++--------------------- > 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.6.1 >