From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] drivers: psci: replace psci firmware calls
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:47:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151216134740.GB22916@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151216125509.GA27585@ermac>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:55:11PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:55:29AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > [CC'ed Daniel]
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:44:22PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > What's the plan for merging this? I assume this'll go via arm-soc?
> > >
> > > I talked to Arnd about this and he suggested to go via Russel.
> >
> > Heads-up, this patch will conflict with:
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7418351/
> >
> > that goes via linux-pm tree, please let me and Daniel know how
> > you want us to sort this out.
>
> I guess this arm-smccc patchset need to go together with that patch in
> some way. I've just uploaded my patches in Russels patch system, but I
> can stop that and try to go via the linux-pm tree instead if you think
> the maintainer would accept that. I'll need to ask Russel if he can ack
> the patches "arm/arm64: add arm-smccc" and
> "arm: add implementation for arm-smccc" first though.
>
> Would that work or do you have another idea? I'm of course happy either
> way as long as the patches get through. I'm new to this so any advice is
> appreciated.
It is really up to Daniel and Russell. If Daniel acks:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7418351/
I can easily rebase it and send it to RMK patch system (as things stand
it seems the easier option), otherwise the merge conflict (which will show
up in -next anyway) has to be sorted out, I am open to suggestions.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 11:04 [PATCH v3 0/4] ARM SMC Calling Convention interface Jens Wiklander
2015-11-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] arm/arm64: add arm-smccc Jens Wiklander
2015-11-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] arm: add implementation for arm-smccc Jens Wiklander
2015-11-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: " Jens Wiklander
2015-11-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drivers: psci: replace psci firmware calls Jens Wiklander
2015-12-01 8:46 ` Jens Wiklander
2015-12-01 18:47 ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-01 19:44 ` Jens Wiklander
2015-12-16 10:55 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-12-16 12:55 ` Jens Wiklander
2015-12-16 13:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2015-12-17 7:07 ` Jens Wiklander
2015-12-21 9:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151216134740.GB22916@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox