From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:05:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH V1 00/11] MMCONFIG refactoring and ARM64 PCI hostbridge
 init based on ACPI
In-Reply-To: <20151216125136.GE5890@jayachandranc.netlogicmicro.com>
References: <1445963922-22711-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>
 <20151207203117.GB14429@localhost>
 <20151209100125.GA12632@jayachandranc.netlogicmicro.com>
 <20151209155511.GB21048@red-moon>
 <20151216125136.GE5890@jayachandranc.netlogicmicro.com>
Message-ID: <20151216140556.GC22916@red-moon>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:21:37PM +0530, Jayachandran C. wrote:

[...]

> > That list is there to manage hotplug bridges, what makes you think
> > it is not necessary ? Jiang (in CC) can certainly comment on that and
> > how that list handling can be updated/simplified, if possible.
> 
> Looking thru the code, I think moving the MCFG code to common can be
> done in a simpler way. I have posted a new patchset for this.
> (And I don't see how the hotplug case needs the list, but that is not
>  relevant now)

You must work with Tomasz and come up with a unified patchset that
implements ACPI PCIe support for ARM64. We do not need more churn, we
need a working set, period. Posting separate RFCs just adds to the
confusion and to maintainers' review backlog, with the end result of
confusing everyone and achieving nothing.

Lorenzo