From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:02:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] pwm: lpc32xx: fixes in the LPC32xx PWM driver In-Reply-To: <1449401522-22590-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com> References: <1449401522-22590-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com> Message-ID: <20151216160247.GJ28947@ulmo> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > The changeset fixes a number of issues within current implementation > of LPC32xx PWM controller driver, namely > - the SoC has two independent PWM controllers with one channel each, > - runtime warnings from common clock framework, > - overflow in duty cycle calculation may result in disabled PWM, > - unsupported period values are not accepted. > > Correction of PWM channels requires a correspondent change in > arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi, it has been already sent for review. > > Changes from v1 to v2: > - corrected style of examples in documentation, > - improved commit messages > > Version v1 can be found here: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2828 > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg105398.html > > Vladimir Zapolskiy (6): > dt: lpc32xx: pwm: correct LPC32xx PWM device node example > dt: lpc32xx: pwm: update documentation of LPC32xx PWM device > pwm: lpc32xx: correct number of PWM channels from 2 to 1 > pwm: lpc32xx: fix warnings from common clock framework > pwm: lpc32xx: fix and simplify duty cycle and period calculations > pwm: lpc32xx: return ERANGE, if requested period is not supported > > .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.txt | 9 +++- > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 59 ++++++++-------------- > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) All patches applied, thanks. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: