From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:42:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v6 08/20] arm64: ilp32: add is_ilp32_compat_{task, thread} and TIF_32BIT_AARCH64 In-Reply-To: <20151218144437.GA4007@yury-N73SV> References: <1450215766-14765-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <1450215766-14765-9-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <20151217114153.GD25232@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20151218141112.GD31200@yury-N73SV> <20151218144437.GA4007@yury-N73SV> Message-ID: <20151221174205.GB24894@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:44:37PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:11:12PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:41:53AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:42:34AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > > > > Reviewed-by: David Daney > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner > > > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski > > > > > > Long description missing. > > > > Hi, Catalin, > > > > I think this patch (and patch #3 too) is trivial, and > > explanation in patch name is clear enougth. So, I just do not > > understand what else to explain here. Could you point me, and then I > > will do it. > > > > Is it OK? > > arm64: ilp32: add is_ilp32_compat_{task,thread} and TIF_32BIT_AARCH64 > > ILP32 tasks are needed to be distinguished from lp64 and aarch32. > This patch adds helper functions is_ilp32_compat_{task,thread} and > thread flag TIF_32BIT_AARCH64 to address this. This patch is > preparation for following patches in ilp32 patchset. It looks fine to me. -- Catalin