linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:18:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151222221847.GH2793@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151222205604.GA14912@quark.deferred.io>

* Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> [151222 12:56]:
> On 12/22, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [151222 12:28]:
> > > On 12/22/2015 05:27 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > >On dm814x we have 13 ADPLLs with 3 to 4 outputs on each. The
> > > >ADPLLs have several dividers and muxes controlled by a shared
> > > >control register for each PLL.
> > > >
> > > >Note that for the clocks to work as device drivers for booting on
> > > >dm814x, this patch depends on "ARM: OMAP2+: Change core_initcall
> > > >levels to postcore_initcall".
> > > >
> > > >Also note that this patch does not implement clk_set_rate for the
> > > >PLL, that will be posted later on when available.
> > > >
> > > >Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> > > >Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > >Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> > > >Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > > >---
> > > >
> > > >If no more comments, Tero can you please apply into an immutable
> > > >branch against v4.4-rc1 that I can merge in too?
> > > >
> > > >Changes since v3:
> > > >
> > > >- We want to create the clkdev entry for all clocks, not just outputs
> > > >- ti_adpll_wait_lock loops did not do the right thing
> > > >- We want to use CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE in ti_adpll_init_dco
> > > 
> > > I have just one comment below still, once that is addressed:
> > > 
> > > Conditionally-acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > Stephen / Michael, can you pick this up for next merge? I don't have
> > > anything else coming for the window this time, and I am probably going to be
> > > on vacation just nicely to not be able to push anything anyway.
> > 
> > Also, I managed to remove the dependency to the dts changes. So there's
> > no longer any need to set up an immutable branch for this patch.
> 
> Can you split the binding description into a separate patch and send it
> to the dt mailing list? Feel free to add my Ack to it.

OK will do thanks.

> Stephen and I are trying to not take that stuff anymore.

Sure, no problem.

Regards,

Tony

      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22 15:27 [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 20:30 ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-22 20:32   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 20:56     ` Michael Turquette
2015-12-22 22:18       ` Tony Lindgren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151222221847.GH2793@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).