From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:47:57 -0800 Subject: [GIT PULL 2/4] omap changes for ti81xx devices and minimal dra62x j5eco-evm support In-Reply-To: References: <567869f7.9440620a.dbdb.65d1SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <20151222225331.GI30172@localhost> <20151222233343.GI2793@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20151223014756.GJ2793@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, * Olof Johansson [151222 15:41]: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Olof Johansson [151222 14:58]: > >> > >> I'm a little puzzled by how you chose to organize this branch. We usually > >> ask for SoC enablement and new DT files separately. Is there a reason you > >> couldn't split out the SoC pieces and include those in the soc branch, and > >> leave the DT contents for this one? > > > > Hmm yeah I guess I kept all the 81xx stuff in a single branch because of the > > earlier largeish set of 81xx fixes that had interlaced dts and SoC changes > > that had to be in a specific order to keep system booting because of bugs in > > the dts defined clocks. > > > > If you want to, I can respin these patches into two branches, one for dts and > > one for SoC changes. Probably both branches have to be based on the earlier > > branch "omap-for-v4.5/81xx-fixes-signed" to avoid merge conflicts though. > > Yeah, that sounds good. Please do. OK updated pull requests sent. It's now three separate pull requests starting with "[GIT PULL 1/3] reworked fix for earlier ti81xx changes for v4.5 merge window". Regards, Tony