From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 00:34:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: mm: flip priority of CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA In-Reply-To: <20151224001121.GS2793@atomide.com> References: <20151202202725.GA794@www.outflux.net> <20151223195129.GP2793@atomide.com> <567B04AB.6010906@redhat.com> <20151223212911.GR2793@atomide.com> <20151224001121.GS2793@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20151224003406.GA8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:11:22PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Nicolas Pitre [151223 13:45]: > > We fixed a bunch of similar issues where code was located in the .data > > section for ease of use from assembly code. See commit b4e61537 and > > d0776aff for example. > > Thanks hey some assembly fun for the holidays :) I also need to check what > all gets relocated to SRAM here. > > In any case, seems like the $subject patch is too intrusive for v4.5 at > this point. Given Christmas and an unknown time between that and the merge window actually opening, I decided Tuesday would be the last day I take any patches into my tree - and today would be the day that I drop anything that causes problems. So, I've already dropped this, so tomorrow's linux-next should not have this change. You'll still see breakage if people enable RODATA though, but that's no different from previous kernels. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.