From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:26:48 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/5] arm64: Introduce Allwinner SoC config option In-Reply-To: <1450787267-26836-6-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> References: <1450787267-26836-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1450787267-26836-6-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160104112648.GD11722@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Andre, Arnd, On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:27:47PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > To prepare for supporting the Allwinner A64 SoC, introduce a config > option to allow compiling Allwinner (aka. sunxi) specific drivers > for ARM64. > This patch just defines the ARCH_SUNXI symbol to allow Allwinner > specific drivers to be selected during kernel configuration. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara I'm ok taking this patch. I'm not quite sure how the process works though with arm64. Should I send a PR with this patch to Catalin, or does it go through the usual arm-soc maintainers? We should also probably extend the MAINTAINERS entry, shouldn't we? Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: