From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:03:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v5 03/11] arm-cci: Group writes to counter In-Reply-To: <1451908490-2615-4-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> References: <1451908490-2615-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <1451908490-2615-4-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160104190353.GC17127@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:42AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > Add a helper to group the writes to PMU counter, this will be > used to delay setting the event period to pmu::pmu_enable() > > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: Punit Agrawal > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose > --- > drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c > index ce0d3ef..f6b8717 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c > @@ -785,6 +785,21 @@ static void pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value) > __pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, idx); > } > > +/* Write a value to a given set of counters */ > +static void __pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u32 value) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs) > + __pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, i); > +} I don't understand this as-is. Why do all the counters have the same value? > +static void __maybe_unused > +pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u32 value) > +{ > + __pmu_write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value); > +} Why are these not just one function for now? Mark.