From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:16:19 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V11 3/7] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver In-Reply-To: References: <1451865996-12808-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1451865996-12808-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20160105044619.GJ2940@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:37:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > +static int set_priority(struct hidma_mgmt_dev *mdev, unsigned int i, u64 val) > > +{ > > + u64 tmp; > > + int rc; > > + > > + if (i > mdev->dma_channels) > > Shouldn't be >= ? I somehow missed that. There is no merit is posting not related context while replying, makes your emails harder to read, please fix that > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + tmp = mdev->priority[i]; > > + mdev->priority[i] = val; > > + rc = hidma_mgmt_setup(mdev); > > + if (rc) > > + mdev->priority[i] = tmp; > > + return rc; > > +} > > + > > +static int set_weight(struct hidma_mgmt_dev *mdev, unsigned int i, u64 val) > > +{ > > + u64 tmp; > > + int rc; > > + > > + if (i > mdev->dma_channels) > > Ditto. Exactly, ditto... -- ~Vinod