linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dennis.chen@arm.com (Dennis Chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-next PATCH] arm64: fix kernel crash with 48-bit VA and 64KB granule
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:35:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105083533.GD13942@arm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-pz8rA2EfU6NwCndmoYneOjYUt8_PodTdZkepV3cRXJQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:36:39AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 5 January 2016 at 03:18, Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com> wrote:
> > The commit 3400749b5a22 ("arm64/efi: refactor EFI init and runtime
> > code for reuse by 32-bit ARM") uses pgd_alloc() to allocate space for
> > efi_mm.pgd while not the static efi_pgd[], since this function will be
> > called with early_initcall, which results in the pgd_cache used by
> > pgd_alloc() has not been initialized yet, kernel will hang in this
> > case. This patch is trying to make the pgd_cache_init() called before
> > arm_enable_runtime_services() by changing its core_initcall to
> > early_initcall.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
> > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> > index cb3ba1b..859a788 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> > @@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ static int __init pgd_cache_init(void)
> >                                               SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -core_initcall(pgd_cache_init);
> > +early_initcall(pgd_cache_init);
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Apologies for not spotting this before sending it out.
>
> The issue only occurs when PGD_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE, which is why I did
> not see it myself. I only tested with 4k/39-bits and 64k/42-bits IIRC,
> since the series this is part of primarily concerns ARM not arm64.
>
> Anyway, shuffling init ordering is my least favorite way of fixing
> bugs. Since only ARM requires pgd_alloc() (for the kernel mappings),
> we could also simply factor out pgd_alloc() into efi_pgd_alloc(), and
> define it to mean '__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP)' on arm64.
>
>
Ard,

Both arm and arm64 provide pgd_alloc(), I don't think it's a good idea to create
another efi_pgd_alloc() used by efi only, which looks more like a temp workaround.
Plus, for 64KB page granule when VA = 48bit, the PGD_SIZE = 0x200, it doesn't make
sense to get an entire page as the space for the efi.pgd. Changing the init order
sequence is a reasonable way to fix it unless you can see some potential issues there.

> --
> Ard.
>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-05  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05  2:18 [linux-next PATCH] arm64: fix kernel crash with 48-bit VA and 64KB granule Dennis Chen
2016-01-05  7:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-05  8:35   ` Dennis Chen [this message]
2016-01-05  8:38     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-05  8:40       ` Dennis Chen
2016-01-05  9:56         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-06  6:14           ` Dennis Chen
2016-01-06  7:13             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-06  7:38               ` Dennis Chen
2016-01-06  7:42                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-06  8:52                   ` Dennis Chen
2016-01-06  8:54                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-06  8:59                       ` Dennis Chen
2016-01-06  9:51                         ` Will Deacon
2016-01-05 12:31   ` Will Deacon
2016-01-05 12:47     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-05 15:44       ` Will Deacon
2016-01-06  2:55         ` Dennis Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160105083533.GD13942@arm.org \
    --to=dennis.chen@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).