public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM64: kernel: implement ACPI parking protocol
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:01:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160108150142.GB10630@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPw-ZTmsLqgh6W6R0uLgQjueV7XjaGOD49CYCRYufJ43zT8Kyg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Loc,

[CC'ed Jeremy - I know he is testing this on m400]

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:12:20PM -0800, Loc Ho wrote:

[...]

> >> I put it together to make sure that it is there if any platform
> >> compliant with it relies on it and more importantly to prevent
> >> non-compliant implentations from trickling into the kernel,
> >> basically to prevent broken firmware implementations from being
> >> considered compliant and "working".
> >
> > That's a good point. However, AFAIK, AMD are using PSCI already in their
> > firmware implementation and that's what we recommend anyway if EL3 is
> > available.
> >
> > So this patch is mainly aimed at X-Gene since other implementations I'm
> > aware of have EL3 already. What are the chances of Applied Micro fixing
> > their firmware and actually using this patch? (not a question for you;
> > I'm hoping some Applied engineers would comment).
> >
> 
> Sorry that I missed this. This FW is now fixed and tested with Lorenzo
> patch. Though some minor manual patch will be required with recent
> kernel. I was going to get some one to ack the patch but got tied up
> with other matter. As for availability of the FW, it is currently
> internally only and will be available sometime next year for the next
> FW release. If any one interested in the FW, you can contact me.

I guess that by "some minor manual patch" you meant you had to rebase
the patch on top of mainline, I can post an updated version for you to
test.

Mind giving a tested-by if FW has been updated to comply with the specs
and tested with my patch applied ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo

       reply	other threads:[~2016-01-08 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAPw-ZTmsLqgh6W6R0uLgQjueV7XjaGOD49CYCRYufJ43zT8Kyg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-08 15:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-01-08 19:05   ` [PATCH v2] ARM64: kernel: implement ACPI parking protocol Loc Ho
2016-01-25 21:28     ` Loc Ho
2015-09-10 17:40 Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-11 13:30 ` Mark Salter
2015-09-11 14:35   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-06 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-06 17:15   ` Mark Salter
2015-10-06 17:31     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-07 13:03       ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160108150142.GB10630@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox