linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] arm-cci: Provide hook for writing to PMU counters
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:54:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111105454.GG6499@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451908490-2615-9-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:47AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Add a hook for writing to CCI PMU counters. This callback
> can be used for CCI models which requires some extra work
> to program the PMU counter values. To accommodate group writes
> and single counter writes, the call back accepts a bitmask
> of the counter indices which need to be programmed with the
> given value.
> 
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index 2f1fcf0..47c9581 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct cci_pmu_model {
>  	struct event_range event_ranges[CCI_IF_MAX];
>  	int (*validate_hw_event)(struct cci_pmu *, unsigned long);
>  	int (*get_event_idx)(struct cci_pmu *, struct cci_pmu_hw_events *, unsigned long);
> +	void (*write_counters)(struct cci_pmu *, unsigned long *, u32 val);
>  };
>  
>  static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[];
> @@ -846,7 +847,15 @@ static void pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
>  		dev_err(&cci_pmu->plat_device->dev, "Invalid CCI PMU counter %d\n", idx);
>  		return;
>  	}
> -	__pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, idx);
> +
> +	if (cci_pmu->model->write_counters) {
> +		unsigned long mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs)];
> +
> +		memset(mask, 0, BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs) * sizeof(unsigned long));
> +		set_bit(idx, mask);
> +		cci_pmu->model->write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> +	} else
> +		__pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, idx);
>  }

It would be much simpler to always log writes here, and only do the real
wirtes in batches when we re-enable the PMU (with appropriate
disable/enable calls in the IRQ handler).

We'd still need special hooks for CCIs which require a special dance to
program them, but all the logic to handle the writes would be in one
place.

This should work, regardless.

Thanks,
Mark.

>  
>  /* Write a value to a given set of counters */
> @@ -861,7 +870,10 @@ static void __pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u
>  static void __maybe_unused
>  pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u32 value)
>  {
> -	__pmu_write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> +	if (cci_pmu->model->write_counters)
> +		cci_pmu->model->write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
> +	else
> +		__pmu_write_counters(cci_pmu, mask, value);
>  }
>  
>  static u64 pmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-11 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-04 11:54 [PATCH v5 00/11] arm-cci: PMU updates Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] arm-cci: Define CCI counter period Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 18:27   ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05  9:50     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] arm-cci: Refactor pmu_write_counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:01   ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] arm-cci: Group writes to counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:03   ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 10:51     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:44       ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:48         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] arm-cci: Refactor CCI PMU enable/disable methods Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] arm-cci PMU: Delay counter writes to pmu_enable Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 19:24   ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05  9:59     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:46       ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 11:08         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 11:24           ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 18:12             ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] arm-cci: Get the status of a counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:50   ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-11 10:58     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] arm-cci: Provide hook for writing to PMU counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-11 10:54   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-01-11 12:14     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] arm-cci: CCI-500: Work around PMU counter writes Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-04 11:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160111105454.GG6499@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).