linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 6/9] mfd: axp20x: Add support for RSB based AXP223 PMIC
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:09:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111120902.GE19803@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v67N_C5bLTPmQs2gcTkpYt=2=Dk8LjWLEzHqGU--qhu+9g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >
> >> The AXP223 is a new PMIC commonly paired with Allwinner A23/A33 SoCs.
> >> It is functionally identical to AXP221; only the regulator default
> >> voltage/status and the external host interface are different.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig        | 11 +++++++
> >>  drivers/mfd/Makefile       |  1 +
> >>  drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c   | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c       |  2 ++
> >>  include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h |  1 +
> >>  5 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c

[...]

> >> +static int axp20x_rsb_probe(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev)
> >> +{
> >> +     struct axp20x_dev *axp20x;
> >> +     int ret;
> >> +
> >> +     axp20x = devm_kzalloc(&rdev->dev, sizeof(*axp20x), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +     if (!axp20x)
> >> +             return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> +     axp20x->dev = &rdev->dev;
> >> +     axp20x->irq = rdev->irq;
> >> +     sunxi_rsb_device_set_drvdata(rdev, axp20x);
> >
> > What's the point of this call?  Why do you need a sunxi_ variant?
> 
> This is an inline call defined in include/linux/sunxi-rsb.h,
> which is equivalent to dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, data).
> 
> It seems many subsystems or bus drivers have this pattern.
> 
>     git grep void.*_set_drvdata include/linux/ | wc -l
> 
> yields 34, not including dev_set_drvdata itself and this sunxi_rsb
> variant.

That doesn't answer my question.  Why is it required?

Looks like superfluous churn to me.  Aggregation for the sake of it.

> >> +     ret = axp20x_match_device(axp20x);
> >> +     if (ret)
> >> +             return ret;
> >> +
> >> +     axp20x->regmap = devm_regmap_init_sunxi_rsb(rdev, axp20x->regmap_cfg);
> >> +     if (IS_ERR(axp20x->regmap)) {
> >> +             ret = PTR_ERR(axp20x->regmap);
> >> +             dev_err(&rdev->dev, "regmap init failed: %d\n", ret);
> >> +             return ret;
> >> +     }
> >> +
> >> +     return axp20x_device_probe(axp20x);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int axp20x_rsb_remove(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev)
> >> +{
> >> +     struct axp20x_dev *axp20x = sunxi_rsb_device_get_drvdata(rdev);
> >> +
> >> +     return axp20x_device_remove(axp20x);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static const struct of_device_id axp20x_rsb_of_match[] = {
> >> +     { .compatible = "x-powers,axp223", .data = (void *)AXP223_ID },
> >> +     { },
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, axp20x_rsb_of_match);
> >> +
> >> +static struct sunxi_rsb_driver axp20x_rsb_driver = {
> >> +     .driver = {
> >> +             .name   = "axp20x-rsb",
> >> +             .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(axp20x_rsb_of_match),
> >> +     },
> >> +     .probe  = axp20x_rsb_probe,
> >> +     .remove = axp20x_rsb_remove,
> >> +};
> >> +module_sunxi_rsb_driver(axp20x_rsb_driver);
> >> +
> >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PMIC MFD sunXi RSB driver for AXP20X");
> >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>");
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> >> index 54a00168da26..968d77fb95d8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> >> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static const char * const axp20x_model_names[] = {
> >>       "AXP202",
> >>       "AXP209",
> >>       "AXP221",
> >> +     "AXP223",
> >>       "AXP288",
> >>  };
> >>
> >> @@ -616,6 +617,7 @@ int axp20x_match_device(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
> >>               axp20x->regmap_irq_chip = &axp20x_regmap_irq_chip;
> >>               break;
> >>       case AXP221_ID:
> >> +     case AXP223_ID:
> >>               axp20x->nr_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(axp22x_cells);
> >>               axp20x->cells = axp22x_cells;
> >>               axp20x->regmap_cfg = &axp22x_regmap_config;
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> >> index 00697c6ad8b0..d82e7d51372b 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> >> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum {
> >>       AXP202_ID,
> >>       AXP209_ID,
> >>       AXP221_ID,
> >> +     AXP223_ID,
> >>       AXP288_ID,
> >>       NR_AXP20X_VARIANTS,
> >>  };
> >

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-11 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-16 16:32 [PATCH v6 0/9] mfd: axp20x: Add support for RSB based AXP223 Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] mfd: axp20x: Add AXP223 to list of supported PMICs in DT bindings Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] mfd: axp20x: Remove second struct device * parameter for axp20x_match_device() Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-11  9:25   ` Lee Jones
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] mfd: axp20x: use dev->driver->of_match_table in axp20x_match_device() Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-11  9:25   ` Lee Jones
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] mfd: axp20x: Split the driver into core and i2c bits Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-11  9:25   ` Lee Jones
2016-01-12  2:06     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-12  7:39       ` Lee Jones
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] mfd: axp20x: Whitespace, open parenthesis alignment code style fixes Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-11  9:24   ` Lee Jones
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] mfd: axp20x: Add support for RSB based AXP223 PMIC Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-11  9:24   ` Lee Jones
2016-01-11 11:58     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-11 12:09       ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-01-11 12:49         ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-11 13:35           ` Lee Jones
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] regulator: axp20x: Support new " Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] ARM: dts: sun8i: sinlinx-sina33: Add AXP223 PMIC device and regulator nodes Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-12-16 16:32 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] ARM: dts: sun8i: q8-common: " Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-04  8:40 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] mfd: axp20x: Add support for RSB based AXP223 Chen-Yu Tsai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160111120902.GE19803@x1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).