From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:13:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice In-Reply-To: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> References: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> Message-ID: <20160111161333.GK6588@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:01:42PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: > The driver currently chooses between internal chip-select or gpio > based on the existence of the cs-gpios DT property which fails on > non-DT systems and also enforces the same choice for all devices. Normally you shouldn't send incremental patches against patches that have already been applied. However in this case I'm going to drop your original patch anyway due to the issue that was found so it's OK. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: not available URL: