From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:24:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice
In-Reply-To: <yw1xd1t8w0ps.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
References: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com>
 <20160111161333.GK6588@sirena.org.uk>
 <yw1xd1t8w0ps.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Message-ID: <20160111162448.GL6588@sirena.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:16:31PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> > Normally you shouldn't send incremental patches against patches that
> > have already been applied.

> Should or shouldn't?

Should, sorry.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160111/3a1187e0/attachment.sig>