From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: drjones@redhat.com (Andrew Jones)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:48:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v8 20/20] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8ayUEoH7zX+cGrOcT7kCWnLzMfgo2NFTbPt3aSPwt-+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFEAcA_MDiOphseZ7RGNE3G=4ZDF5SFV5krOjanPbVuhgg9gnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <568E7AF1.9040103@huawei.com>
 <CAFEAcA-Qcda7TSFLSeykLHqZYdP6tYdEjPe2uHN6f_+omqWFZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160107203647.GJ6199@hawk.localdomain>
 <20160109122956.GA30867@cbox> <20160109150339.10576e81@arm.com>
 <20160111140717.GD3924@hawk.localdomain>
 <20160111150929.GB15554@cbox>
 <20160111160927.GF3924@hawk.localdomain>
 <CAFEAcA8ayUEoH7zX+cGrOcT7kCWnLzMfgo2NFTbPt3aSPwt-+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160111164845.GI3924@hawk.localdomain>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:13:12PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 January 2016 at 16:09, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I think the save/restore case is where I always flip to seeing it as a
> > bunch of separate per cpu devices. It would feel better to me to
> > save/restore the cpu-gic registers the same way we do all other cpu
> > registers.
> 
> From QEMU's point of view this would be extremely awkward, which
> is one reason I'm happy with the GICv3 API we came up with
> and reviewed last year...

OK, I'll shut up about this. As I didn't speak then, I shall now forever
hold my peace :)

drew