From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:41:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v5 5/6] mfd: dt-bindings: add device tree bindings for Hi3519 sysctrl In-Reply-To: <5694584D.7040301@huawei.com> References: <1452219400-32478-1-git-send-email-xuejiancheng@huawei.com> <1452219400-32478-6-git-send-email-xuejiancheng@huawei.com> <20160111054846.GD3331@x1> <56935EA8.4060801@huawei.com> <20160111085555.GE14104@x1> <5694584D.7040301@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20160112074107.GK19803@x1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, xuejiancheng wrote: > > > On 2016/1/11 16:55, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, xuejiancheng wrote: > >> On 2016/1/11 13:48, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> On Fri, 08 Jan 2016, Jiancheng Xue wrote: > >>> > >>>> Add device tree bindings for Hi3519 system controller. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jiancheng Xue > >>>> --- > >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ > >>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt > >>> > >>> I have this patch, but none of the others in the set, thus I am > >>> lacking context. > >>> > >> I can forward other patches in the set to you. Thank you. > >> > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 0000000..115c5be > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > >>>> +* Hisilicon Hi3519 System Controller Block > >>>> + > >>>> +This bindings use the following binding: > >>>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt > >>>> + > >>>> +Required properties: > >>>> +- compatible: "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl". > >>>> +- reg: the register region of this block > >>>> + > >>>> +Examples: > >>>> +sysctrl: system-controller at 12010000 { > >>>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl", "syscon"; > >>>> + reg = <0x12010000 0x1000>; > >>>> +}; > >>> > >>> There is no requirement (nor want) for binding documents where the > >>> given device is simply using highly generic bindings. This just > >>> amounts to churn. > >>> > >> This block is specific for Hi3519 SOC, and may has its own driver. > > > > Does it have its own driver currently? > > > Not yet. > Arnd Bergmann and Rob Herring all suggested adding a specific compatible string > with the SOC name. This binding is just used for describing the compatible string now. > When more functions on hi3519 SOC are added later, the specific driver will be also > needed. Save this binding until it has more functionality. We here "I'll add to this later" all too often. > >> So I think it's better to keep this binding. > > > -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog