From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?=) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:32:41 +0100 Subject: /sys/class/power_supply/bq27200-0/capacity changed meaning between 4.1 and 4.4? In-Reply-To: <20160113102613.GA28729@earth> References: <20160109230709.GA30551@amd> <5693BB75.70409@ti.com> <20160111214247.GA9735@amd> <56942344.9070609@ti.com> <56951A2C.9010602@ti.com> <20160112215352.GA5248@amd> <20160113084424.GC11560@pali> <20160113102613.GA28729@earth> Message-ID: <20160113103241.GH11560@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 13 January 2016 11:26:13 Sebastian Reichel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:44:24AM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 January 2016 22:53:52 Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > >>If not, tell me, and I can do it, but it will involve a lot of swaring... > > > > > > > > > >I'll give it a look over. > > > > > > > > OK, I'm still looking for a test setup, but this was definitely a problem, > > > > could you give this a try?: > > > > > > Well, search no more. I tested it and seems to work ok. There's one > > > more blank line in the source, so I had to apply patch by hand. > > > > > > Tested-by: Pavel Machek > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek > > > Reported-by: Pavel Machek > > > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org > > > > > > ? :-). > > > > > > And... thanks! > > > Pavel > > > > There are more pending fixes for bq27xxx... Maybe your is duplicate? > > No, it's not a duplicate. > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/70090 > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/69716/focus=69714 > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/69716/focus=2110580 Hm... It looks like Pavel's patch is subset of this 3rd patch as it fix function bq27xxx_battery_read_soc() > > Sebastian, please take them and ideally send to stable@ for backporting. > > There is no need to send them to stable@, if they are properly > tagged with a 'Fixes: ("title")' tag, so please always > include it in your commit messages, if possible :) I have not sent those patches, but OK. In that email thread you can find sha1 commit id which broke it. -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com