From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@baylibre.com (Michael Turquette)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:26:37 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v2] clk: mediatek: Allow changing PLL rate when it is off
In-Reply-To: <1452482936-51852-1-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>
References: <1452482936-51852-1-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>
Message-ID: <20160114022637.1942.4564@quark.deferred.io>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi James,

Quoting James Liao (2016-01-10 19:28:56)
> Some modules may need to change its clock rate before turn on it.
> So changing PLL's rate when it is off should be allowed.
> This patch removes PLL enabled check before set rate, so that
> PLLs can set new frequency even if they are off.
> 
> On MT8173 for example, ARMPLL's enable bit can be controlled by
> other HW. That means ARMPLL may be turned on even if we (CPU / SW)
> set ARMPLL's enable bit as 0. In this case, SW may want and can
> still change ARMPLL's rate by changing its pcw and postdiv settings.
> But without this patch, new pcw setting will not be applied because
> its enable bit is 0.

Must the clock signal be enabled to change the PLL rate? If so, does
ARMPLL set the CLK_SET_RATE_GATE flag?

> 
> Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> index 966cab1..8e31fae 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> @@ -91,9 +91,6 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw,
>                 int postdiv)
>  {
>         u32 con1, val;
> -       int pll_en;
> -
> -       pll_en = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON0) & CON0_BASE_EN;
>  
>         /* set postdiv */
>         val = readl(pll->pd_addr);
> @@ -114,15 +111,13 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw,
>  
>         con1 = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
>  
> -       if (pll_en)
> -               con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG;
> +       con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG;

This unconditionally enables the PLL whenever clk_set_rate is called,
changing the previous behavior. The clk framework still tracks the
intent of ARMPLLs users with the enable_count. How about something like
the following:

	bool pll_en = clk_hw_is_enabled(&pll->hw);

	if (pll_en)
		con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG;

	writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
	if (pll->tuner_addr)
		writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr);

	if (pll_en)
		udelay(20);

This does not rely on the hardware to tell us the intent of the user,
but instead on our framework usecounting.

Regards,
Mike

>         writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
>         if (pll->tuner_addr)
>                 writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr);
>  
> -       if (pll_en)
> -               udelay(20);
> +       udelay(20);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>