From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/13] clk: at91: make IRQ optional and register them later
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:39:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160115103901.1b987f53@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160115020237.GJ22188@codeaurora.org>
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:02:37 -0800
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 12/04, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > @@ -686,3 +652,45 @@ static void __init of_at91sam9x5_clk_main_setup(struct device_node *np)
> > }
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE(at91sam9x5_clk_main, "atmel,at91sam9x5-clk-main",
> > of_at91sam9x5_clk_main_setup);
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id atmel_clk_main_dt_ids[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-clk-main-osc" },
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-clk-main-rc-osc" },
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-clk-main" },
> > + { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init atmel_clk_main_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct of_phandle_args clkspec = { .np = pdev->dev.of_node};
> > + struct clk_main *clkmain;
> > + struct clk_hw *hw;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_from_provider(&clkspec));
> > + if (!hw)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + clkmain = to_clk_main(hw);
> > + clkmain->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (!clkmain->irq)
> > + return 0;
>
> Is there any way to get the irq into this probe function without
> getting a clk pointer and then unwrapping it to get an irq
> value out of the clk_hw wrapper structure? That's a pretty
> convoluted design.
Not sure I get what you're suggesting, but the only solution I see to
avoid this "get main clk pointer dance" would be to have a global
variable storing the clk_main instance (or a list of clk_main
instances).
The thing is, I'd like to avoid adding new global variables in this
clk drivers as much as possible. Moreover, the core is already taking
care of keeping the list of all registered clks, with their associated
of_node, so, is there a real point in creating a duplicated association
list in this driver too?
Maybe we could create an of_clk_hw_get_from_provider(), which would
prevent the creation of this useless per-user clk instance (see the patch
below).
>
> > +
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&clkmain->wait);
> > + irq_set_status_flags(clkmain->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, clkmain->irq, clk_main_irq_handler,
> > + IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, __clk_get_name(hw->clk),
> > + clkmain);
> > + if (ret)
> > + clkmain->irq = 0;
> > +
You should probably call clk_put() on the pointer returned by
of_clk_get_from_provider(&clkspec).
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
>
Best Regards,
Boris
--- >8 ---
>From a83670d29504e256bdc97c04f0dfd96a7d6842bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:36:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] clk: add a function to retrieve a clk_hw instance from a
clkspec definition
of_clk_hw_get_from_provider() is providing a way to retrieve a clk_hw
instance from a clkspec definition. Which is usefull in case a clk driver
wants to get one of its own instance from a clkspec, without allocating a
new per-user clk struct.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index f13c3f4..fbef1b7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -3001,6 +3001,42 @@ void of_clk_del_provider(struct device_node *np)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_clk_del_provider);
+/**
+ * of_clk_hw_get_from_provider() - Look for a clk_hw instance registered with
+ * the given clkspec definition.
+ * @clkspec: pointer to a clock specifier data structure
+ *
+ * This function looks up a struct clk_hw from the registered list of clock
+ * providers, an input is a clock specifier data structure as returned
+ * from the of_parse_phandle_with_args() function call.
+ */
+struct clk_hw *of_clk_hw_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec)
+{
+ struct clk_hw *clk_hw = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+ struct of_clk_provider *provider;
+
+ if (!clkspec)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ /* Check if we have such a provider in our array */
+ mutex_lock(&of_clk_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(provider, &of_clk_providers, link) {
+ struct clk *clk = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+
+ if (provider->node == clkspec->np)
+ clk = provider->get(clkspec, provider->data);
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
+ clk_hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&of_clk_mutex);
+
+ return clk_hw;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_clk_hw_get_from_provider);
+
struct clk *__of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
const char *dev_id, const char *con_id)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
index c56988a..bb62517 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
@@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ void devm_clk_unregister(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk);
const char *__clk_get_name(const struct clk *clk);
const char *clk_hw_get_name(const struct clk_hw *hw);
struct clk_hw *__clk_get_hw(struct clk *clk);
+struct clk_hw *of_clk_hw_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
unsigned int clk_hw_get_num_parents(const struct clk_hw *hw);
struct clk_hw *clk_hw_get_parent(const struct clk_hw *hw);
struct clk_hw *clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(const struct clk_hw *hw,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-15 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-04 17:03 [PATCH v3 00/13] ARM: at91: PMC driver rework Alexandre Belloni
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] clk: at91: make use of syscon to share PMC registers in several drivers Alexandre Belloni
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] clk: at91: make use of syscon/regmap internally Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] clk: at91: clk-main: factorize irq handling Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] clk: at91: make IRQ optional and register them later Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-15 9:39 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-01-16 1:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-16 12:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-01-20 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-22 15:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-01-25 22:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] clk: at91: only disable available IRQs Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] clk: at91: pmc: merge at91_pmc_init in atmel_pmc_probe Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] clk: at91: pmc: move pmc structures to C file Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] ARM: at91: pm: simply call at91_pm_init Alexandre Belloni
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] ARM: at91: pm: find and remap the pmc Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] ARM: at91: pm: move idle functions to pm.c Alexandre Belloni
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] ARM: at91: remove useless includes and function prototypes Alexandre Belloni
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] usb: gadget: atmel: access the PMC using regmap Alexandre Belloni
2015-12-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] clk: at91: pmc: drop at91_pmc_base Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-12-10 17:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] ARM: at91: PMC driver rework Boris Brezillon
2015-12-15 9:22 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-15 2:07 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160115103901.1b987f53@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).