From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:20:54 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] arm-cci: simplify sysfs attr handling
In-Reply-To: <5698C9E2.7040405@arm.com>
References: <1443523283-6248-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <20151104111112.GA23860@leverpostej> <5698C9E2.7040405@arm.com>
Message-ID: <20160115112054.GB3262@leverpostej>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:28:50AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 04/11/15 11:11, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:41:23AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>There's no need to dynamically initialise attribute pointers when we can
> >>get the compiler to do it for us. We also don't need a dev_ext_attribute
> >>for the cpumask, as the drvdata for a PMU device is a pointer to struct
> >>pmu.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> >>Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> >>Reviewed-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> >>Tested-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> >>Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >>Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 100 +++++++++++++-------------------------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> >
> >Arnd/Olof, are you happy to pick this up?
> >
> >I don't believe there are any other pending changes to the CCI code, and
> >haven't been since I posted this so it still applies atop of v4.3.
> >
> 
> fyi,
> 
> This hasn't made into arm-soc tree yet.

Ok. We're in the middle of the merge window, so it's understandable if
this isn't picked up.

Suzuki, would you be happy to pick this up as a prefix of your CCI patch
series for now?

Thanks,
Mark.