How to get better precision out of getrusage on the ARM?

From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: How to get better precision out of getrusage on the ARM?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:16:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160119001618.GT3367@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF_dkJBM3qbs3GB8jdgonus7dgVSyn-7QtogtqmMQWzR2BK+OQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Patrick,

I was wondering whether you had the chance to test this patch from the
RT tree:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git/commit/?h=v4.4-rt2&id=57142bdff523a67657d0b2603eaa91df58b88bd8

when trying your sched_clock experiment?

On 30/12/2015 at 10:00:46 -0500, Patrick Doyle wrote :
> Continuing on...
> I now have a CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARED()'ed 10 MHz clock source running
> on my ARM processor (Atmel SAMA5D2 Xplained board).  It registers
> itself through sched_clock_register() to provide a high resolution
> sched clock.  Once I turned on "Full dynticks CPU time accounting"
> (CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN), I was able to get better than jiffy
> resolution from my calls to getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD,..).  But things
> still aren't quite right.  I am using getrusage() to provide some
> runtime profile information to an existing application (that was
> ported to run on Linux instead of a custom RTOS).  I have code that
> looks like:
> 
> tick()
> // commented out code that used to do something
> tock()
> 
> where tick() & tock() are my profile "start" and "stop" points that
> call getrusage() to record and and accumulate time spent between calls
> to tick() & tock().  Most of the time, I get a delta of 0 between the
> two calls, which I expect.  But occasionally, I get a delta ranging
> between 800us and 1000us, which I don't understand at all.  It seems
> like my thread is being "charged" for time spent doing something else.
> Perhaps an interrupt occurred and its time got charged to my thread;
> perhaps a higher priority thread ran for 1ms, I don't know (yet).
> 
> Does anybody have any suggestions as to where I might look, or as to
> what kernel CONFIG options might make the most sense for an
> application such as this?
> 
> --wpd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com