From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:54:08 +0100 Subject: [linux-sunxi][PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: dts: sun7i: Add Itead Ibox support In-Reply-To: References: <1452766555-16409-1-git-send-email-codekipper@gmail.com> <1452766555-16409-4-git-send-email-codekipper@gmail.com> <20160118194100.GR4581@lukather> Message-ID: <20160121155408.GG3997@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:43:34AM +0100, Code Kipper wrote: > >> +&spi0 { > >> + pinctrl-names = "default"; > >> + pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_pins_a>, > >> + <&spi0_cs0_pins_a>; > >> + status = "okay"; > > > > What device is connected to that bus? > > These lead out to the header on the side of the box and is also > enabled in the fex. If we remove this we might as well remove sata as > that is also done via this header. AFAIK, the SATA is not muxable, so the pins on this header can only be used for that anyway. What I'm more concerned about is pins that are just "generic" pins that can have multiple functions that are not really enforced by any design choice. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: